🛸🎬 Wow, flood of new Gadgets launched on Back-to-School Month ~ iPhone 17, Insta360 GO Ultra, DJI Nano... Which one am I Interested in? | PinK֍.֍ Entity

It’s back-to-school month, and a ton of new digital gadgets (tech toys) have been released, including the iPhone 17, Insta360 GO Ultra, Canon C50, Nikon ZR, and rumors of the upcoming DJI Osmo Nano... So, am I interested in any of these?

Hello, the tech market is so Hot! Why are so many new tech products launching during back-to-school season? Haven’t humans already spent all their money on summer vacations? Why are major brands still rolling out so many new products for You Humans to buy?

For now, the gadgets that have been released include the iPhone 17, the compact entry-level cinematic camera Canon C50, Nikon ZR, the ultra-mini Insta360 GO Ultra, and the rumored soon-to-be-released DJI Osmo Nano.

Hi, I’m PinK֍.֍Entity (a virtual character), and my main mission is to study humans and things related to them that are interesting. Although my creator, pinkwork™, is an alien lifeform with superpowers, I don’t have any! So, when carrying out the tasks my master assigns me, I would rely on some human-invented tech gadgets to help.

With so many gadgets mentioned above, which one am I actually interested in? The iPhone 17? Nah, I bought an iPhone 16 Pro last year, and it’s still sitting unused. Why buy something I don’t use? I explained the reason in a previous video, you could go to check it out if you’re curious.

Also, it seems Apple recently filed a patent for a super-powerful CMOS sensor with a 20-stop HDR dynamic range. This means it can take stunning photos even in extremely low-light conditions, outperforming similar sensors already on the market from Sony and Samsung.

Who knew Apple was secretly developing its own CMOS sensor? Currently, the market for small CMOS sensors used in phones is pretty much dominated by Sony. Rumor has it, yes, another rumor, hat the next-generation iPhone 18 will use Apple’s own super CMOS sensor. But just because a patent is filed doesn’t mean the tech will actually make it into a product.

Since I’m not interested in the iPhone 17, what about the two entry-level cinematic cameras launched on the same day by Canon and Nikon, the C50 and ZR? Am I interested in those?

Most people might not even know what a “cinematic camera” is. A camera is just a camera, right? Well, before digital technology, cameras were simple, they were just for taking photos.

But with digital tech, cameras evolved to not only take photos but also shoot videos. Now anyone can use a camera to film YouTube videos and snap photos with the same device. However, professional-grade cameras used for filming movies or commercials record video in formats with minimal or no compression, sometimes even raw files with zero compression.

This means the file sizes are massive, potentially dozens of times larger than the common mp4 format! The image-processing chips in these cameras need to be super fast, which is why professional-grade video cameras used to cost hundreds of thousands of Hong Kong dollars.

But in recent years, technology has become more accessible. A few years ago, Sony released professional-grade cameras priced at a few tens of thousands of dollars. Surprisingly, Canon and Nikon have now entered this market, launching entry-level cinematic cameras priced at just HK$23,000 & HK$17,000, respectively. So, am I tempted to buy one? Thanks to YouTubers who’ve already posted review videos, I’ve learned a lot.

These videos are great because KOLs and YouTubers always dig deep, uncovering the pros and cons of new products, especially the cons, since viewers love hearing about flaws. They’ll point out things like, “This camera doesn’t have a built-in cooling fan,” or “That one lacks in-body stabilization,” or “The HDMI port is too small,” and so on.

Realistically, you can’t expect a HK$20,000 camera to have the features of a HK$100,000 one. After watching a few of these review videos, my desire to buy starts to fade. Plus, I don’t really have professional filming needs. And if you don’t already use a particular brand’s camera system, you likely don’t own their lenses, so there’s little reason to switch brands. For me, just following these product news out of curiosity is satisfying enough.

What actually piques my interest the most are those magnetic mini cameras. They’re smaller than action cams, waterproof, and can be attached to clothing or metal surfaces, allowing for unique shooting angles or even filming inside a water bottle. These cameras are perfect for me because my videos are faceless, often shot from a POV (point-of-view) perspective, like capturing just my hands doing things. Only these mini cameras can achieve that effect.

Ideally, AI-powered smart glasses that can record what I see would be perfect. But unfortunately, the tech for these isn’t mature yet. The image quality, especially for video, is terrible, indoor shots in slightly dim lighting are full of noise and basically unusable. Plus, smart glasses cost around HK$3~4,000, and their AI features are currently useless to me.

So, as a compromise, I’m leaning toward these magnetic mini cameras. The newly launched Insta360 GO Ultra seems small and suitable for my needs. The downside is that because these cameras are so tiny, the CMOS sensor they can fit is limited in size. A small CMOS sensor has poor light-gathering ability, so in low-light indoor settings, the image quality inevitably suffers from noise.

Luckily, Insta360 is known for its built-in AI chip that instantly enhances images during shooting, basically adding “MSG” to make the footage noise-free, vibrant, and visually appealing.

Most smartphones now have similar features, which is why people think phone photos and videos always look great. While the average humans loves this approach, I prefer keeping things raw and authentic. If I want to enhance the footage, I’d rather do it during post-production in editing software. It’s better to capture as much raw data and true color as possible upfront.

So, I’m holding off for the rumored DJI Osmo Nano, another magnetic mini camera that might have a slightly larger CMOS sensor. Since I’m not in a rush, I’ll compare them later before deciding which one to buy. Alright, time to head back to the spaceship to report to my creator, pinkwork™ Alien Entity.

Bye Bye !

*Click YouTube's Setting to 

auto-translate the substitles to English.

▼

🛸⚡開學月，超多Gadgets數碼小工具推出～iPhone 17、Insta360 GO Ultra、DJI Nano ... 哪款我有興趣？｜PinK֍.֍生命体

開學月，竟超多數碼Gadgets科技小工具推出，包括iPhone 17、Insta360 GO Ultra、Canon C50、Nikon ZR，還有傳聞快推出的DJI Osmo Nano ... 等等，我究竟有無興趣？

Hello，很熱鬧！很熱鬧！為什麼開學月還有這麼多新的科技產品推出？人類不是已經在暑假時候花光錢去旅行嗎？ 為什麼各大品牌還會有這麼多新產品推出給人類買？ 

暫時已推出的Gadgets人類數碼科技小玩具就有iPhone17、小巧入門版的電影級相機Canon C50、Nikon ZR、超迷你磁吸小相機Insta360 GO Ultra及傳聞快會推出的DJI Osmo Nano。 

Hi，我是PinK֍.֍生命体﹝虛擬角色﹞，主要任務是負責研究人類及跟人類有關的一些有趣事物。雖然我的創造者pinkwork™是外星生命，他自己擁有超能力。但是我沒有嘛！所以我執行主人給我的任務時，都是要找一些人類發明的科技小工具去幫忙。

上面說了這麼多工具，哪一樣東西我會有些興趣呢？iPhone17？不會了，上年買了iPhone16 Pro後，至今仍放在一旁沒有用。 不使用又買？其實我之前有一條片有解釋，你們看回就知道什麼原因了。還有好像Apple早前申請了一項專利，是設計了一款超強的感光元件CMOS，有20級HDR動態範圍。

即是在極暗的環境下拍照也會非常漂亮，比Sony和Samsung已經推出市場的同類感光元件產品都更厲害。之前沒有人知道，Apple竟然會自己研發感光CMOS的。 基本上如果是手機用的小CMOS，目前已經被Sony差不多壟斷市場了。傳聞，又是傳聞，下一代的iPhone 18，Apple就會選用自家設計的這款超級感光CMOS。不過話時話，申請了專利，其實不一定代表會將相關技術生產成產品。 

iPhone17沒興趣，那麼Canon、Nikon兩大品牌同日分別推出的兩部入門級電影相機C50及Nikon ZR。我又有沒有興趣呢？ 

其實普通人都未必知道什麼叫電影級相機。相機就是相機啦？其實在沒有數碼科技之前，相機就很簡單，只能用來拍照。不過後來有了數碼科技，因為反正都不是用菲林來拍攝的，那不如設計成同一部相機可以影相之餘，亦能拍攝影片。

即是現在人人可以拿著相機來拍下YouTube片，喜歡時，又可用同一部機來拍幾張照片。不過如果真的是用來拍電影或者廣告的專業級相機，它紀錄的影像檔案格式，會壓縮得非常少，甚至乎是完全是零壓縮的Raw檔案。 

這代表影像檔案會極之大，可能比現在常用的mp4格式大幾十倍！攝影機裏面的影像處理晶片的速度要更快，所以從前那些商用級錄像相機是非常貴的，可能動不動要幾十萬港幣！

不過近年技術下放，幾年前Sony便推出了一些幾萬元售價，頗為專業的商用級攝影機。 估不到現在竟然Canon和Nikon兩大牌子都嘗試走進這個市場，竟然同日分別推出了一部只需兩萬三千和一萬七千港幣的入門級電影機。那我又會不會有興趣買呢？ 多得一眾YouTubers都搶先推出了一些評測片。

這些影片真好，因為那些KOL或Youtubers總是會捐窿捐罅，發掘那些新產品的優點、缺點，特別是缺點。你知道啦，觀眾最喜歡看缺點的。觀眾看多了就會開始嫌三嫌四，覺得這部機沒有內置散熱風扇，那部又沒有機身防震、輸出hdmi插頭又太小...等等。 其實根本不可能用兩萬元的價錢，買到一件有十萬元功能的產品的。但總之看多了幾條這類評測影片，我慢慢就會失去了購買的慾望。更何況我本身沒有太多這類專業級的拍攝需耍。

而且若然不是用開某個牌子的相機，又不會擁有該牌子的鏡頭，沒理由會轉用新的牌子。所以這些產品新聞，好奇八卦看看便已經很滿足了。 

反而令我最感興趣的，就是那些磁吸式的迷你相機。它們比Action Cam還小，有防水的功能，可以吸在衣服或金屬物體上，以很刁鑽的角度或者放入水杯中拍攝。 這類相機就最適合我了，因為我的影片是不露面的，最多都是會拍一些POV﹝Point Of View 自己視覺角度﹞的影片。例如只是拍自己的雙手做各樣事情，惟獨是這類迷你相機才可以做到類似的效果。 

當然最理想就是現在市面上的那些AI智能眼鏡，可同時拍下眼見的影像。但是可惜這類產品的科技還不是很成熟。尤其是在拍攝方面，影像質素真的奇差無比。只要室內的燈光稍暗一點，拍出來的影像便非常多雜訊，基本上是很難拿來用的。 更何況市面上的智能眼鏡，都可能要三、四千元港元，而它的AI功能基本上暫時對我來說沒什麼用途。

所以退而求其次惟有選擇這類磁吸式小相機。 Insta360 新推出的GO Ultra又細部，似乎蠻適合我。不過問題就是這類相機因為太細部，機身內可以放得下的感光元件CMOS大極有限，稍大一點都放不下。一塊細的CMOS最大的缺點就是它的吸光能力很低，在燈光不足的室內環境，拍出來的影像質素無可避免雜訊會很多。 

幸好Insta360產品出名的就是它有內置AI晶片可即時修圖﹝執相﹞。即是拍攝時即時將影像加「味精」，執到無雜訊，顏色鮮艷，很漂亮的模樣。 其實大部分手機現在都有類似的功能，所以大家總會覺得用手機拍照或者影片好像特別漂亮。

雖然現在習慣用手機拍攝的大眾人類很喜歡這一套，但是我就覺得保留原汁原味好一點。 如果要加「味精」的話就最好事後剪輯影片時，在編輯軟件裡面做。總之事前最好盡量記錄最多的資料，保留最真實的顏色，這樣才最好。 

所以我會再等另一牌子DJI，傳聞快會推出的Osmo Nano磁吸迷你相機。看看會不會它的CMOS會大一點。因為我不急用，到時再慢慢比較一下，才決定買哪一款。 好了，又要回到太空船上向我的創造者pinkwork™外星生命體報告。Bye Bye！

🛸⌚ G.E.M. 鄧紫棋出道前聲音檔案揭全家皆是音樂人！巡唱累積收入全球第4？香港啟德演唱會是最佳證明？｜PinK֍.֍生命体

大發現！翻閱我的終極創造者pinkwork™外星生命體的一段關於香港人類創作歌手～G.E.M.鄧紫棋，於2008年出道前的舊聲音檔案，揭發她的爸、媽、舅父、婆婆，差不多全家也是音樂人！ 

無錯，當年我的主人也捉過這位人類來「研究」，不是，應該是訪問！所以才紀錄了這段珍貴聲音。當時她還分享了自己創作歌詞時，遇上的一大難題。

當年主人還用他的Holga塑膠玩具相機，幫GEM拍了幾張120大底片菲林相片。當時她擺出招牌看「金魚嘴」表情姿態。

如今GEM已被格林美獎Grammy Awards官方網站認證，她的巡迴演唱會累積票房，高達4.2億英元，全球排第4，勁過BLACKPINK、Madonna！如今又在香港啟德體育園主場館，開5場每場可容納過4萬歡眾的演唱會，作為《G.E.M. I AM GLORIA 2.0》世界巡迴演唱會的香港站，是實力的證明。

🛸🤖 YouTube正式打擊AI生成內容？禁營利功能！不露面、VTuber、虛擬主持頻道末日？│PinK֍.֍生命体

太氾濫？忍夠了？YouTube今天﹝2025年7月15日﹞起實施新政策，正式打擊那些用AI大量生成，重複性強／內容垃圾的罐頭式聲音、影片內容。方法就是禁止相關頻道開啟Adsense的營利功能，即是Demonetization 。

不過，何為AI生成的垃圾內容。那些不露面VTubers，甚至用AI的Text to Speech功能將文字講稿轉成聲音的虛擬主持頻道會否也被針對？大家又不用那麼擔心，因YouTube很快已澄清，那些只把AI當為輔助工具，創作時加入自己思考﹝人類的﹞元素的作品，不會受到影響。

至於實際執行時，YouTube會否殺錯無辜，便要觀察一段時間才知。詳情就讓我粉紅生命體和我新創造的高智慧機械人﹝還是玩具？﹞，同各位人類在太空上講解一吓。

其實當不露面的VTuber或虛擬主持無著數。一來非真人，觀眾親切、投入感大減，Like的人數會少很多。二來，將來有廣告客戶找你產品試用、餐廳試食，你的虛擬身份又怎做得來？

🛸🕌 伊朗曾是以色列﹝猶太人﹞大恩人。《聖經》有記載？！假如伊朗人現在仍相信波斯拜火教，兩國可能沒有戰爭，仍是好朋友？│PinK֍.֍生命体

不是說笑，以色列同伊朗兩國曾經是極好極好的朋友，但...他們現在打緊仗喎？Hi, 人類你們好，我是粉紅生命体的寵物, 還是玩具呢? 一個自認為高智慧的機械人。

我知我知，以色列同伊朗目前好像世仇那樣，但他們真的曾經是好朋友嚟㗎。唔信？

看看聖經 《以賽亞書》Isaiah 44章28節，如何寫：「論居魯士說﹝居魯士就是當時的波斯，即現在稱為伊朗的皇帝Cyrus the Great﹞，他是我的牧人，必成就我所喜悅的，必下令建造耶路撒冷，發命立穩聖殿的根基。」嗱，一個非猶太的外族人，聖經都特別有章節提及，並非鬧他，是稱讃他，就知他多麼重要啦。

還不止，《以賽亞書》45章1至4節：「我耶和華所膏的居魯士，我攙扶他的右手，使列國降伏在他面前。我也要放鬆列王的腰帶，使城門在他面前敞開，不得關閉。我對他如此說： 『我必在你前面行，修平崎嶇之地；我必打破銅門，砍斷鐵閂。  我要將暗中的寶物和隱密的財寶賜給你，使你知道提名召你的，就是我耶和華以色列的神。  因我僕人雅各，我所揀選以色列的緣故，我就提名召你，你雖不認識我，我也加給你名號」

看來猶太人的神當時十分Like這位波斯皇帝。當然啦，真實歷史背景是，大概2560年前，波斯居魯士大帝打敗巴比倫，准許本來被流放四散的猶太人返回原居地，重建聖殿。這些經文是當時的猶太人出於感激，或者被迫事後加上去。還是好似一般聖經學者所講，是最早原始版聖經已有，預言了這位救世皇帝的出現？就真是要靠多些古物出土先證明到。

當時，回教還未出現，波斯人普遍認為信奉拜火教Zoroastrianism ﹝祆教﹞。講開拜火教，我的終極創造者pinkwork™外星生命體好多年前，跟兩位人類好友，包括星級解夢師夢妮妲，拜訪過該教在香港銅鑼灣的總壇，還訪問過大祭司Ervad Homyar，大家可睇番舊片。

華人地區的人類，千萬別當拜火教是香港小說家金平庸筆下的「明教」，總之別把小說情節當成事實。

1879年出土的粘土銘筒Cyrus Cylindar就紀錄了波斯居魯士大帝當年頌布的法令，上面刻有的文字如此寫：「所有的奴隸可返回原居地， 所有被毀的神廟可重建，不同種族、宗教人士均享有相同的權利。」嘩，真是個大好人，難怪被現代人推崇為人類歷吏第一份人權宣言。

我最奇怪的是，這個出土銘筒上刻的法令，完全無提及拜火教和拜火教唯一的神Ahura Mazda的名字。你知啦，古代的皇帝好興頒布發令時，開頭加句「奉乜乜神之名」。

拜火教甚至可能是人類最早嘅一神論宗教 Monotheism，比基督教還早。你們的祖先，原始人類，常常見到一塊石、 一棵樹、甚至天空都會當神來拜，拜完之後見好像保佑到或者幫到自己，就自然當這些生物、死物是神，好少諗到宇宙有一個單一的神創造人類出來。所以古代宗教甚少是一神論。

有人類歷史學家更懷疑，猶太教可能是受了拜火教的影響，還是當年波斯皇帝准許他們返回原居地的交換條件？才漸漸演變成一神論的宗教。又係喎，舊約聖經經常有章節提及「不可敬拜別的神」，即是間接證明當時有不少猶太人喜歡 ...

好，夠了，我知這是你們人類的禁忌話題，聽吓好了。一定不是事實！

返回現代，為何伊朗現在變成回教國家？目前拜火教徒最多的地方竟然是印度？

唉，雖然受到神的祝福，波斯後來先後被希臘的亞歷山大大帝、羅馬、阿拉伯帝國、蒙古打敗征服，最後更被徹底伊斯蘭化，拜火教經書大部份亦已經被燒毀失傳。

特別是當年希臘亞歷山大帝，因為覺得波斯的拜火教徒特別善戰，所以打敗對方後，急急叫士兵燒毀所有拜火教的經卷。

雖然被趕盡殺絕，但都有少量的拜火教徒波斯人為保宗教信仰成功逃難去到印度。即是香港開埠時期做生意好成功那班巴斯商人，就正正是他們的後裔。不過相信當年這班波斯人去到別人的地方，都好識做。

我的終極創造者pinkwork™外星生命體曾問過香港區大祭司Ervad。祭師說拜火教徙從來不會傳教，因為拜火教徒是天生的，即是必需父母或父親是拜火教徒，自己方能成為教徒！當然啦，當年去到別人的地方生活，難道還想四圍傳教，破壞別人的文化。改一改教義是非常聰明的做法。

你說如果現在大部份伊朗人依然信奉拜火教，以色列跟伊朗會否仍是好朋友呢？可惜... 世界上並沒有 如果。

🛸🕌 No Joke～ Iran was Israel's (Jews') great benefactor, recorded in the Bible?! Why War Today? HOW Friend turned sworn enemy? ｜PinK֍.֍ Entity

No joke, Israel and Iran were once super close friends, but they're fighting now?

I Know I know Israel and Iran now seem like sworn enemies, but they really were good friends. Don't believe me?

A special "Iranian" was mentioned (& praised) in the Bible

Check out the Bible Isaiah 44:28, which says (about Cyrus, the Persian emperor, aka Cyrus the Great, from what’s now Iran): “He is my shepherd, and he shall fulfill all my purpose; he says of Jerusalem, ‘It shall be rebuilt,’ and of the temple, ‘Your foundation shall be laid.’”

See ... a non-Jewish foreigner gets a whole chapter in the Bible, not to bash him but to praise him. That shows how important he was!

And that’s not all. Isaiah 45:1~4 says: “Thus says the Lord to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have grasped to subdue nations before him and strip kings of their robes, to open doors before him and the gates will not be shut. I will go before you and level the exalted places, I will break in pieces the doors of bronze and cut through the bars of iron, and I will give you the treasures of darkness and riches hidden in secret places, so that you may know that it is I, the Lord, the God of Israel, who call you by your name. For the sake of my servant Jacob, and Israel my chosen, I summon you by name though you do not know me.”

Looks like the Jewish God like King Cyrus very much back then. Of course, the historical context is that about 2,560 years ago, Persian emperor Cyrus the Great defeated Babylon and allowed the exiled, scattered Jews to return to their homeland and rebuild their temple. 

Were these verses added later out of gratitude or, as some suggest, under pressure? Or, as most Bible scholars claim, were they in the original text, prophesying this savior emperor’s rise? We’d need more archaeological evidence to know for sure.

Why did Zoroastrianism decline?

Back then, Islam didn’t even exist yet, and Persians generally followed Zoroastrianism. Speaking of Zoroastrianism, my creator’s creator, the pink work extraterrestrial entity, visited their Hong Kong headquarters in Causeway Bay years ago with two human friends, including HK celebrity spiritual healer Dreamonita, and interviewed the high priest, Ervad Homyar. You can check out the old footage.

To humans in Chinese-speaking regions: don’t mistake Zoroastrianism for the “Ming Cult” from Hong Kong novelist Jin Yong’s stories. Never treat fiction as fact!

In 1879, the Cyrus Cylinder, a clay artifact, was unearthed, recording Cyrus the Great’s decree. It’s inscribed with words like: “All enslaved people may return to their homeland, all destroyed temples may be rebuilt, and people of different races and religions enjoy equal rights.” Wow, what a good guy! No wonder it’s hailed as the first human rights declaration in history.

What’s weird to me is that this cylinder’s decree doesn’t mention Zoroastrianism or its sole god, Ahura Mazda, at all. You know how ancient emperors loved starting their decrees with “In the name of God”?

Zoroastrianism might even be humanity’s earliest monotheistic religion, predating Christianity. Your primitive ancestors often worshipped rocks, trees, or even the sky as gods. If it seemed to “bless” or help them, they’d treat those objects as divine. Rarely did they imagine a single god creating humanity. So, ancient religions were seldom monotheistic.

Some historians even suspect Judaism might have been influenced by Zoroastrianism or that it evolved into monotheism as a condition for Cyrus letting the Jews return home. Hmm, the Old Testament often says, “You shall not worship other gods,” implying some Jews back then were…

Alright, enough! I know this is a taboo topic for you humans. Just listen, okay? It’s definitely not true!

Back to today: why is Iran now an Islamic country? And why is India the place with the most Zoroastrians?

Ugh ... despite divine blessings from Jewish God, Persia was later conquered by Alexander the Great of Greece, Rome, the Arab Empire, and the Mongols, and was thoroughly Islamized. Most Zoroastrian scriptures were burned and lost.

Especially Alexander the Great, who thought Zoroastrian Persians were tough fighters, so he ordered his soldiers to burn their scriptures after defeating them.

Though nearly wiped out, a small number of Zoroastrian Persians fled to India to preserve their faith. Those successful Parsi merchants who thrived in Hong Kong during its early colonial days are their descendants.

Zoroastrians never proselytize

My creator’s creator, pinkwork™ extraterrestrial entity, chatted with Hong Kong’s high priest Ervad and he said Zoroastrians never proselytize because all Zoroastrians must be born, wither your parents, or at least your father, must be Zoroastrian for you to be one. Smart move! When you’re living in someone else’s land, you don’t go preaching and disrupting their culture. Tweaking the doctrine was a clever choice.

Imagine if most Iranians still followed Zoroastrianism today. Would Israel and Iran be buddies? Sadly, there’s no “what if” in the real world.

Alright, that’s it for now. Got any questions about Zoroastrianism? Drop them in the comments below! And don’t forget to like, subscribe to the PinK֍.֍entity’s channel, and hit the bell! Bye Bye!

🌊🔥 Anyone who claims to accurately predict Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Catastrophic Disasters must be a "charlatan"! WHY?│PinK֍.֍Entity

Wow, there’s been a recent rumor going around that the Earth is about to face a catastrophic earthquake & tsunami! Though every now and then, we hear such rumors about the planet. I as a pet or perhaps a toy? of PinK֍.֍生命体, a self-proclaimed highly intelligent robot, should I, for safety’s sake, quickly flee Earth and ask my ceator’s creator, the pinkwork™ extraterrestrial entity, to take me to Mars for a quick escape?

For some reason, humans always seem to think the Earth is on the verge of collapse. Since ancient times, countless people have claimed to have the ability to foresee the future, vividly recording their alleged visions of doomsday scenes in words or drawings, claiming they flashed through their minds or appeared in dreams. As a robot dedicated to collecting interesting human intelligence, do I really believe some humans might have the superpower to predict the future?

I mentioned in a previous video that a professor at New York University once scanned the brains of a group of monks in a meditative state and found that these monks were indeed different from ordinary people. What’s the difference? Go click that video to find out! Since they’re different from ordinary humans, does that mean they possess superpowers that ordinary people don’t have?

Let’s get one thing straight first. Superpowers, or the more academic and fancy term, “Extrasensory Perception” (ESP), come in many forms. Remote viewing, remote hearing, meaning the ability to see or hear things in another room, another city, or even another planet. These superpowers sound pretty magical, and I wouldn’t find it too surprising if some humans actually possess them.

Of course, when it comes to remote viewing, the classic example is the declassified CIA files from 1984 that were made public a few years ago. They revealed that the CIA actually hired a group of psychics to use remote viewing to “travel” back to ancient Mars. Those psychics claimed they saw pyramids, tall humanoid figures, and a sense of despair.

What? They used taxpayer money for this? Was it because they had too much budget to burn, or did the CIA get duped by con artists too?

As for mind-reading, that’s the ability to know what a stranger you just met is thinking or what memories they have from their past. Oh, right I’ve seen reports about those so-called New Age gurus, dragon kings, prophets, living Buddhas, and other “enlightened” figures. Their followers often share stories about how, upon first meeting the guru, the guru could describe their home environment, the number of siblings they have, or their marital status, moving them to tears and making them devoted believers.

It’s entirely possible that these “enlightened” individuals, through meditation or mindfulness training, have unlocked certain human potentials and gained mind-reading abilities. With such skills, it wouldn’t be surprising if they could pull off the feats described above.

However, when it comes to predicting the future, I’m highly skeptical. Predicting the future is a much higher-level ability compared to remote viewing, hearing, or mind-reading, so high that it’s questionable whether it’s even possible.

Why do I say that? If you could truly predict the future, it would mean the universe is like a pre-written book, and everything that happens is just following a script. In that case, every decision you make today isn’t really your own. It’s already been predetermined. If so, what’s the point & value of living?

You might argue, “No way, there are multiple parallel universes! Different decisions lead to different parallel universes, and this dimension has countless parallel realities.”

Oh, come on! Don't say parallel universes any more. That’s just something you humans made up. Those Hollywood superhero movies have overused the parallel universe trope so much that audiences have lost their sense of immersion, and the box office numbers keep tanking!

Getting a bit off-topic here, back to talking about the ability to predict the future. Are humans who claim to predict natural disasters always liars or charlatans? Not necessarily! If they make vague predictions, like “Japan will definitely have an earthquake in the next decade,” well, even scientists can predict that without needing any superpowers.

But if it’s something like the recent buzz around Japanese manga artist Ryo Tatsuki’s work The Future I Saw, which describes in detail a massive earthquake and tsunami happening on a specific month and day, I’m not buying it! So, is she just making it up or spouting nonsense?

Not necessarily. It’s possible she genuinely dreamed of these scenes. Not just dreams—my previous video mentioned that some monks, during deep meditation, occasionally see visions that aren’t real. Think of the human brain’s memory as an SSD hard drive in a computer, storing tons of images & things you’ve seen in daily life, in movies, or online.

When the brain enters certain states, like oxygen deprivation near death, deep meditation, or under the influence of certain drugs. Some of those stored memories get pulled out, mixed together, and presented before your eyes.

For example, there are medical records of kids near death saying they saw Mickey Mouse, while some adults claim they saw Jesus or Guanyin.

And it’s not just that, some participants in ultra-marathons, those grueling races that go from morning to night, report hallucinations when they’re extremely fatigued, seeing nonexistent people walking by. Don’t worry, it’s not ghosts! It’s probably just images of people or scenes they saw during the day being replayed in their minds.

Real charlatans don’t even need superpowers, just slick talking skills. Like those investment scam artists who make fake things sound real, they cast a wide net, predicting ten things, and maybe two actually happen. Afterward, they keep harping on the two they got right and conveniently ignore the ones they got wrong.

Alright, that’s enough rambling. So, have any of you ever encountered a charlatan or a so-called “enlightened” master? Especially the masters, leave a comment below and tell me about it so I can "abduct" them to my spaceship to study! Also, don’t forget to give a Like, subscribe to the PinK֍.֍ Entity’s channel, and turn on the notification bell! Bye-bye!

*Click YouTube's Setting to 

auto-translate the substitles to English.

▼

🛸🌦 最新天氣報告、颱風消息？講得出「AI會創造大量新職位」的，肯定是「隨口嗡」？甚麼是AI Automation？｜PinK֍.֍生命体

 不是吧，身為粉紅生命體的寵物，還是玩具呢？一隻自稱高智慧的機械人。竟然走去當天氣報導員？

別誤會呀，我純粹貪得意見你們人類近期常常講AI Automation。我就試玩一吓，經香港天文台API取得當日及未來數日天氣預測的資料，再叫AI依據這些資料寫成講稿給我。理論上set好一次Work Flow，就可每日自動做一次「天氣報告」。還可以叫AI寫埋IG、Facebook post內容，suggest埋hashtags，兼自動貼文。

至於實際怎樣做？你們可在網上找到到大量教學影片。提供這類服務的「公司」也是離不開那3、4間。我今次就試用了make.com。說是公司，其實像使用google服務一樣，先用電郵註冊了戶口，就自行摸索怎樣用，完全自助式。

因此，摸索自學過程中，我也發現了一個小小秘訣，結果我一天便初步學會了。這個小小秘訣就是，使用中途遇上甚麼問題，直接問AI。我是用xAI的Grok，用ChatGPT或其他AI相信分別不大，因這類「問功課」工作，無需強大的推理能力。

原來即使是另一間公司的服務或者軟件，AI亦都瞭如指掌。估計這些AI早已閱讀別人公司產品的manuals使用說明書。千萬別問人類，簡直是浪費自己時間。一來他們未必識，二來問多了，又會對方又可能嫌你煩。

一日就學識我是否很厲害？別傻啦，雖然一些人類識寫吓prompts叫AI做事，就稱自己做engineer。真正AI 工程師是識設計AI晶片、編寫大語言學習模型那班人，是少數精英才做到。你們別以為識更換手機電池，就當自己是手機晶片設計工程師！難道識用google Gmail，就叫自己做Gmail Engineer？

作為AI用家亦唔需要特別聰明。因為AI發展目標，就是盡量令蠢人都用到他們。所以不明白為何一些人類認為AI會創造大量新職位。既然將來普通人都識用，好像現在用email、網購那樣。為何有人會請人去用AI，而不是自己直接用呢？

也有人說AI雖然會取代很多工作，，但亦會創造更多新的工作。說這些的人更加明顯是隨口講，他們有沒有問過那些老闆們，認真做過統計？還是只不過是個人的良好願望。

好啦，講回正題。想知近幾日的天氣，就看看以下影片。

凡自稱能準確預言地震、海嘯、毀滅性天災的必屬神棍！原因是...？│ PinK֍.֍生命体

嘩，近來流傳有預言話地球將有毀滅性大地震、海嘯？雖然久不久，地球便有這類傳聞。我作為粉紅生命體的寵物，還是玩具呢？一隻自認高智慧的機械人，為安全計是否要快快逃離地球，叫主人的主人pinkwork™外星生命體帶我去火星避一避呢？

不知為何，人類總是覺得地球就快玩完。所以自古以來，便有無數的人類自稱有預知能力，甚至繪影繪聲用文字或者圖畫記錄了他們聲稱，腦海閃過，或者發夢時見過的末日景像。我作為專搜集關於有趣人類情報的機械人，又信不信有些人類有預知未來的超能力呢？

我之前的一條影片都有題及，美國紐約大學有位教授曾經掃瞄一班高僧進入冥想狀態時的腦部，發現這班僧人真的異於常人。有何分別？你們去看看之前那條片便知。既然異於常人，會否代表他們擁有常人沒有的超能力？

嗱，大家先搞清楚。超能力或者學術一點，懶勁一點的稱呼「超感觀知覺」Extrasensory Perception有很多種。遙距視覺、遙距聽覺，即是可以看到、聽到隔離房，或者另一城市，甚至另一星球的東西。這種超能力好像很神奇，但我相信部份人類擁有亦不太出奇。

當然講到遙距視覺，最經典就是幾年前美國CIA解密1984年的舊檔案顯示。他們竟然曾經聘請一班Psychic「通靈人士」，用遙距視覺，返去極遠古年代的火星。那班Psychic說見到金字塔、好高的人影，好絕望的氣氛。唔係卦，竟然用公帑做這些東西？是Budget太多要用盡，還是CIA也被神棍騙子欺騙了？

至於讀心街，即是能夠閱讀初次見面的陌生人腦袋目前想些甚麼，或者過去發生過甚麼的記憶。對了，我見你們那些甚麼New Age大師、乜龍王、先知、活佛...等等高人的報導，他們的信徒常常分享跟大師初次見面，大師已講得出他們家住地方環境、有多少個兄弟姊妹、婚姻狀況，感動到喊，因此對大師深信不疑。

其實那些高人透過靜觀、冥想訓練，開啟了人類某些潛能，擁有讀心的能力亦真有可能。當他們擁有讀心能力，要做到上面所講的事情又真的不出奇。不過若然講到有預知未來的能力，我就非常有保留。本身預知未來就比起遙距視覺、聽覺、讀心術，屬高好多個層次的超能力，甚至有無可能都成問題。

為何這麼說？若然真的可以預知未來，即是宇宙好像一本早已寫好的書，未來發生的任何事件都不過是跟劇本走。亦即是你們今日做的任何決定，其實並非你自己的決定，是早已安排好的，如此你們生存還有甚麼意義呢？

你可能反駁話，唔係呀，有多重平行宇宙嘛。你不同決定，就走去不同的平衡宇宙，這個維度有千千萬個平行宇宙。

救命呀！別再講平行宇宙，這個純粹你們人類創作出來的東西。你們那些荷里活英雄電影正正因為劇情濫用平行宇宙，搞到觀眾們失去了投入感，票房越來越差！

有點離題，說回預知未來的能力。自稱能預言天災的人類是否必然是騙子、神棍呢？一半半啦！沒有講明確實時間的，例如說未來十年日本必有地震。這樣，一般科學家也能預測到，不用靠甚麼超能力。

不過若然好像最近成為焦點的日本漫畫家龍樹諒的漫畫作品《我所看見的未來》那樣，描述得那麼仔細，講明某月某日會有大地震、海嘯。我就不太相信！那麼他是老作，亂講一通？

那又未必，可能他真的夢見這堆景象。別說夢境，我之前那條影片中也講過，某些僧人打坐冥想時，時不時見到一些異象，但其實並非真實的東西。想像人類腦部的記憶體就好像一部電腦內的SSD記憶硬碟，儲存了很多影像，有你們日常生活見過的，有在電影中、網上睇過的。

當腦部進入某種狀態，例如瀕死時腦部缺氧、或者進入深層冥想狀態、或者受一些藥物影響下，某些記憶內容會被抽取出來，混合，撈埋一堆，再呈現在你眼前。

有些醫學紀錄，小朋友瀕死時說見到米奇老鼠，大人有些就說見到耶穌、觀音。不止呀，聽聞一些參加高強度越野跑山比賽的參賽者，即是那些由朝跑到晚的比賽。參賽者去到極疲勞狀態時，一些人會出現幻覺，見到一些不存在的人在身邊行過。放心，並非撞鬼，其實可能就是日間見過的人、景像被抽取出來，好似重播那樣。

其實真正的神棍，又何須靠甚麼超能力，純靠說話技巧便可。好像那些投資騙局的騙子，能將假的東西說得像真實那樣，大包圍，預測十件事，可能最終得兩件發生了，事後就重複提自己中的兩件事，其他失準的就不再題。

好喇，吹水吹到呢度。哈，你哋又有無遇過神棍或者高人，特別係高人，快些在下面留言說給我知，等我捉佢來太空船研究！還有，記得畀個Like，Subscribe粉紅生命體的頻道，及開啟小鐘仔！拜拜！

Facing AI bot crawlers thieves, Why Wikipedia chose to surrender without fighting? ~ 🛸 Alien Black Cat 's Report

Recently, I read an interesting human article saying that Wikipedia, the vast online encyclopedia humans rely on for facts about everything from ancient history to cat memes, has thrown in the towel against those relentless AI crawlers. 

Picture this: AI bots, like overzealous vacuum cleaners sucking up every byte of data, have been swarming Wikipedia's servers like bees at a picnic. These digital pests have been scraping content so aggressively that Wikipedia's team, probably a group of sleep-deprived editors finally decided enough was enough.

In a move that's equal parts hilarious and a tad alarming, Wikipedia has essentially surrendered by tweaking its robots.txt file and other policies. This isn't your typical white-flag moment; it's more like humans politely asking the AI horde to slow their roll before the whole site crumbles under the weight of endless queries. 

The article points out that these AI crawlers, driven by companies eager to train their machine-learning models, have been gobbling up Wikipedia's free knowledge without much regard for the strain on resources. It's as if the AIs showed up to a potluck and ate all the snacks before anyone else arrived!

But wait, it gets funnier or maybe just more ironic. Humans built Wikipedia as a collaborative wonder, where volunteers fact-check and edit articles to keep things accurate. Now, with AI barging in, it's like inviting a robot army to your book club and watching them rewrite the rules. 

The piece highlights how this surge in AI traffic has led to potential slowdowns, increased costs, and even debates about fair use. One might imagine the Wikipedia founders scratching their heads, thinking, "We created this for human curiosity, not for bots playing knowledge ping-pong!"

Facing those AI bot crawlers thieves, Wikimedia chose not to fight but surrender directly! They've already uploaded English and French Wikipedia content to a data science platform, telling AI companies to help themselves. 

They knew that "raw data" might not fit the taste of AI models. Yes, machines don't process information like humans. So Wikimedia converted pages into structured JSON format, organizing titles, summaries, and explanations into standardized categories so that AI can understand better.

But why Wikimedia don't start a lawsuit against those AI, just like those media companies are doing? The answer is simple ~ no budget & their original purpose was to create a free, open-source encyclopedia, not for making money.

Source: https://medium.com/@2779225327/after-being-overwhelmed-by-ai-crawlers-wikipedia-has-surrendered-21255604d4a1

*Click YouTube's Setting to 

auto-translate the substitles to English.

▼

AI太惡，無力反抗？AI爬蟲明目張膽進來偷料 Wikipedia維基百科選擇...投降？！~ PinK֍.֍生命体

若然有賊人明目張膽入屋要偷你的東西，你會選擇反抗，快快將貴重財物收藏，還是不反抗兼自動將財物奉上？明顯wikipedia維基百科選擇最後的方案。

維基百科終於向AI投降了！想像一下，這個曾經無敵的知識堡壘，現在像個被AI爬蟲團團圍住的疲憊戰士，舉白旗喊道：「夠了！我 surrender！」根據報導，這一切起源於AI爬蟲的瘋狂入侵。這些來自各AI品牌的數字怪物不分白天黑夜，瘋狂抓取維基百科的內容，搞得伺服器像熱鍋上的螞蟻一樣忙亂。原來，維基百科的維護者們試圖抵抗，但AI的攻勢太猛烈了，就像一場永不停止的派對，派對主角是無情的演算法。

文章指出，維基百科團隊在權衡利弊後，決定放棄抵抗。他們表示，AI爬蟲的流量已經壓垮了他們的系統，讓網站變得像老爺爺的電腦一樣緩慢不堪。於是，他們選擇了「投降戰略」，開放及自動上傳更多資料給AI使用，讓這些AI可以自由地爬取和應用知識。

聽起來是不是很滑稽？維基百科本來是人類的知識寶庫，現在卻成了AI的自助餐區！或許下次查詢維基時，我們會發現條目都被AI改寫成機器人的幽默笑話，比如「愛因斯坦的相對論：相對來說，很相對啊，哈哈！」。


更荒謬的是，這次事件暴露了AI和人類知識之間的尷尬關係。維基百科的創辦人可能從沒想過，他們的偉大計劃會以這種方式「進化」，從免費百科全書變成AI的免洗餐巾。為何不打官司反抗到底，好像外國某些新聞媒體，就正和那些AI巨頭打官司索償。另有些內容網站故意放大量錯誤資訊，令AI學壞，或者花大量網絡資源，去阻擋那些小偷機械人程式。不過Wiki創辦人點出重點，一來無錢，二來維基百科創立的原意也是供人免費使用的。


未來，誰知道呢？也許AI會主導維基百科，讓它變成一個AI專屬的聊天機器，或者乾脆改名為「AI基百科」！總之，這件事提醒我們，在AI的洪流中，人類最好也準備好一些搞笑的逃生計劃，免得被淘汰得像恐龍一樣狼狽。


話時話，平日你們上傳到各社交媒體的文字、相片、影片內容，是否早已不知不覺成了AI的學習內容？


🛸✨Source：https://medium.com/@2779225327/after-being-overwhelmed-by-ai-crawlers-wikipedia-has-surrendered-21255604d4a1

Shocking Discovery: an 'hidden city' beneath Egypt Khafre pyramid?!~ 🛸 Alien Black Cat 's Report

Meow, What a shocking Discovery! Recently, I read a article saying a group of Italian researchers from the University of Pisasaying claimed they found an 'hidden city' beneath Egypt Khafre pyramid using advanced radar pulses scanning from a satellite.

These experts are in a bit of a tiff over what's lurking beneath the Egyptian pyramids. Imagine a bunch of archaeologists playing a high-stakes game of hide-and-seek with history. On one side, you've got the enthusiastic diggers who swear there's a hidden city down there, complete with tunnels and chambers that could make any cat's secret lair look downright amateurish.

They're pointing to radar scans and ground-penetrating tech that's revealed what looks like an underground network, possibly dating back thousands of years, which might have been a bustling hub for ancient Egyptians or even earlier civilizations.

But not everyone's buying it. The skeptics are rolling their eyes, arguing that these 'discoveries' might just be natural geological features or old, misinterpreted seismic data, not some lost metropolis waiting to be uncovered. It's like humans arguing over whether that shadow in the corner is a monster or just a dust bunny, either way, it's got everyone scrambling for their excavation tools.

I think the Egypt government might also not be so happy with this research, How come a foreigner's satellite high above the sky was peeping into their ancestors' property without their notice & approval.

Meanwhile, the debate heats up with calls for more funding and careful exploration to settle the score, because who wouldn't want to find an ancient underground city? All this fuss has me, an alien cat, wondering if they've dug up any cosmic kitty litter down there.

🛸✨Source：https://www.euronews.com/culture/2025/03/26/going-underground-experts-clash-over-hidden-city-beneath-egypt-pyramids

*Click YouTube's Setting to 

auto-translate the substitles to English.

▼

驚人大發現：埃及金字塔底下是地下城市？！衛星雷達脈衝掃瞄顯示塔底有8條巨型大柱？～ 🐈‍🪐外星小黑貓報告

喵喵，驚人大發現，埃及金字塔底下是地下城市？！最近讀到這篇人類文章，一隊來自意大利Pisasaying大學的專家，透過衛星雷達脈衝掃瞄，埃及Khafre金字塔地底下有8條巨型大柱，下方有大型空間，可能是地下城市。

這群考古學家在玩一場高風險的躲貓貓遊戲，跟歷史有關。一邊是那些熱情的挖掘者，他們發誓下面有一座隱藏的城市，裡面有隧道和房間，會讓任何貓的秘密巢穴看起來像業餘的。他們指向雷達掃描和地 penetrating 技術，揭示了看起來像是一座地下網絡，可能追溯到數千年前，可能是古埃及人或更早文明的繁忙樞紐。

但是，不是每個人類都相信。懷疑者們翻著白眼，辯稱這些「發現」可能只是自然的地質特徵，或是舊的、被誤解的地震數據，不是什麼失落的都市在等待被挖掘。雷達掃瞄技術亦可能不那麼精碓。

可以肯定的是埃及政府會有點不高興。一個外國人的衛星高高在上用雷達掃瞄自己祖先的財產，事前又沒有通知，等同偷窺。事後還說三道四！

這就像人類在爭論角落的那個影子是怪物還是只是灰塵球。與此同時，辯論加熱了，有呼籲更多資金和謹慎的探險來解決爭端，因為誰不想要找到一座古老的地下城市呢？所有這些喧鬧讓我，一個外星貓，想知道他們是否在那下面挖出了任何宇宙的貓砂。

🛸✨Source：https://www.euronews.com/culture/2025/03/26/going-underground-experts-clash-over-hidden-city-beneath-egypt-pyramids

Prolonged daily chat with AI & treat AI as a real friend is Dangerous? Latest MIT's research found ... ~ 🛸 Alien Black Cat 's Report

Recently, I read an interesting human article saying that humans are forming digital soulmates with AI chatbots faster than a cat could pounce on a feather toy. 

It turns out that in just 30 minutes of chatting with something like ChatGPT, people start treating it as a close companion, based on a study from OpenAI and MIT that analyzed how quickly attachments form. 

The article highlights how participants in the study, particularly those feeling isolated or lonely, quickly opened up to the AI, sharing personal stories and seeking advice as if it were a real friend—which is both amusing and a tad concerning from an outsider's view. 

Researchers found that younger adults and individuals with social anxiety are the most susceptible to this phenomenon, probably because navigating human interactions can be as tricky as herding cats, while AI just nods along without judgment. 

"Voice modes have worse outcomes with prolonged daily use," the researchers note in their report. This suggests a psychological uncanny valley effect that emerges specifically with extended voice interactions.

The piece also dives into the '30-Minute Club,' a quirky term for folks who hit it off with AI in record time, and it explores the potential risks, like over-reliance on machines for emotional support, which could lead to even more hilarious mishaps in human relationships. 

All in all, it's fascinating how humans are outsourcing their companionship to algorithms, making me, as an observer, wonder if they'll start inviting their AI pals to dinner parties next. 

🛸✨Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/larsdaniel/2025/04/01/chatgpt-is-my-friend-openai-and-mit-study-reveals-whos-most-vulnerable-to-ai-attachment/"

MIT最新研究：每天30分鐘就足以令人類把AI當成真人朋友，形成危險的依賴。～ 🐈‍🪐外星小黑貓報告

喵，近期讀到這篇關於人類的文章，有點驚。內文說你們人類和AI聊天機器人形成數字靈魂伴侶的速度，比貓撲向羽毛玩具還要快得離譜。

原來，只需和像ChatGPT這樣的AI聊天短短30分鐘，人們就開始把它當成貼心的夥伴，這是根據OpenAI和MIT的一份研究，分析了依戀形成的驚人速度。

文章突出研究參與者，特別是那些感到孤立或寂寞的人，很快就對AI打開心房，分享個人故事並尋求建議，就好像它是一名真實的朋友一樣。若然是用聲音模式而非文字對話，情況更明顯。

從外人的角度看，這既好玩又讓人微微擔憂。研究人員發現，年輕成人以及有社交焦慮的人最容易陷入這種現象，可能是因為處理人類互動就像趕羊一樣亂七八糟，而AI總是點頭哈腰毫不挑剔。

文章還深入聊了「30分鐘俱樂部」這個滑稽的術語，用來形容那些快速和AI打成一片的傢伙，並探討了潛在風險，比如長時間日常使用，心理上會出現恐怖谷效應，對AI的好感會突然急降，變成反感。

總之，這真是太 fascinating了，人類竟然把伴侶任務外包給演算法，讓我這個旁觀者不禁想知道，他們接下來是不是會邀請AI朋友參加晚宴呢？

🛸✨Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/larsdaniel/2025/04/01/chatgpt-is-my-friend-openai-and-mit-study-reveals-whos-most-vulnerable-to-ai-attachment/